Page 1 of 1
Matt Damon trying to be slick
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2015 3:37 am
by Cassius Clay
Pay close attention. What do you see?
[youtube]
https://youtube.com/watch?v=wuuBc6WgO14[/youtube]
Re: Matt Damon trying to be slick
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2015 3:55 am
by CashRules
He didn't keep low enough because for just a fraction of a second you can see him running near the back of that vehicle.
Re: Matt Damon trying to be slick
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:06 am
by Cassius Clay
Lol yeah. I don't know why they didn't just use CGI. It's not like it's supposed to be a literal vanishing.....'cause anyone on the other side would just see a weird dude running next to a truck, drawing more attention to himself.
Re: Matt Damon trying to be slick
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2015 9:40 am
by OurGloriousLeader
hahaha amazing
Re: Matt Damon trying to be slick
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2015 2:20 pm
by Anakin McFly
on a slight tangent

Re: Matt Damon trying to be slick
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2015 2:46 pm
by phe_de
@Anakin:
Not only this, but Matt Damon also cost America a lot of money, when they screw up in Cuba (in "The Good Shepherd").
![winkgrin [winkgrin]](./images/smilies/winkgrin.gif)
Re: Matt Damon trying to be slick
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2015 3:32 pm
by Cassius Clay
Also a lot of resources spent of finding/killing Bourne.
Re: Matt Damon trying to be slick
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2015 6:47 pm
by Ptolemy_Banana
Re: Matt Damon trying to be slick
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2015 7:02 pm
by Unvoiced_Apollo
Let's not forget he also nearly nullified all existance with plenary indulgence.
Re: Matt Damon trying to be slick
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2015 7:07 pm
by Cassius Clay
Matt Damon needs to be taken out.
Re: Matt Damon trying to be slick
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2015 7:34 pm
by Cassius Clay
#stopmattdamon2k15
Re: Matt Damon trying to be slick
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2015 9:27 pm
by Cinemachinery
You'd think he's have at least grabbed the edge of the bed of the vehicle and propped his feet along the side.
Re: Matt Damon trying to be slick
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2015 9:46 pm
by BruceSmith78
There was really no point in doing that at all. Imagine someone watching him from the street (we'll assume they're only watching from the angle the camera is) sees the car drive by him and he "disappears". They know he's not a wizard, so obviously he's behind the car. Duh. Besides, unless those two people walked directly in front of this unknown observer the instant Matt ducked down, like they did the camera, they'd even see him duck behind the car.