We need to genocide at least 90% of Religion board posters

Derived Absurdity · Post by **Derived Absurdity** » Tue Mar 22, 2016 5:03 pm

That is all. Get on it.

Cassius Clay · Post by **Cassius Clay** » Tue Mar 22, 2016 5:07 pm

80% should do the trick.

Derived Absurdity · Post by **Derived Absurdity** » Tue Mar 22, 2016 5:07 pm

Better safe than sorry.

Cassius Clay · Post by **Cassius Clay** » Tue Mar 22, 2016 5:13 pm

Wherefore? Are thine not merciful?

Derived Absurdity · Post by **Derived Absurdity** » Tue Mar 22, 2016 7:20 pm

Right now I'm feeling "mercy" is killing them quick.

CashRules · Post by **CashRules** » Tue Mar 22, 2016 11:12 pm

I'm having a hard time thinking of ten percent that should be spared. But we need to start the culling with that stupid bitch, Goz. She's a less intelligent, Australian version of Chx.

Derived Absurdity · Post by **Derived Absurdity** » Wed Mar 23, 2016 12:24 am

I've changed my mind about apologizing to chime. I can't tell yet whether she's an evil dumbass but she's certainly very friendly with the evil dumbasses. And no one seems to care about what I did anyway.

CashRules · Post by **CashRules** » Wed Mar 23, 2016 12:30 am

She's one of those who thinks everything is okay as long as it's a joke.

Derived Absurdity · Post by **Derived Absurdity** » Wed Mar 23, 2016 12:33 am

So she's essentially an evil dumbass. Got it.

CashRules · Post by **CashRules** » Wed Mar 23, 2016 12:36 am

I'll loan you a gun. I have several that can't be traced.

Derived Absurdity · Post by **Derived Absurdity** » Wed Mar 23, 2016 12:54 am

Well great, now I need to learn how to use a gun.

CashRules · Post by **CashRules** » Wed Mar 23, 2016 1:00 am

Yeah, I'm back to hating you now. There is no excuse for anyone over the age of six not knowing how to use a gun.

CashRules · Post by **CashRules** » Wed Mar 23, 2016 5:34 am

And Goz just told a racist joke. Hooray!

Derived Absurdity · Post by **Derived Absurdity** » Wed Mar 23, 2016 3:58 pm

If any of you enjoy my company y'all should be so thankful I never learned how to use a gun.

Post by **Islandmur** » Thu Mar 24, 2016 10:39 pm

I actually don't like chime. She seems fake.

CashRules · Post by **CashRules** » Fri Mar 25, 2016 12:52 am

Agreed, but I haven't been able to figure out her act yet.

Derived Absurdity · Post by **Derived Absurdity** » Fri Mar 25, 2016 2:09 am

That moron OldSamVines has been added to the list.

CashRules · Post by **CashRules** » Fri Mar 25, 2016 2:16 am

No, you're wrong. The term 'war monger' loses any real meaning when applied to someone like Bernie Sanders. The way you are using it comes across as "anybody who supports any war, ever, is a war monger". War is sometimes a necessary evil. Now that doesn't mean Bernie is a pacifist who would avoid war at all costs, which would be far worse than any war monger could possibly be, but he comes nowhere close to Clinton, Trump, Cruz, Obama, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Reagan...

CashRules · Post by **CashRules** » Fri Mar 25, 2016 2:19 am

Goz had a meltdown and deleted her account after her latest bout of the stupids.

Post by **Islandmur** » Fri Mar 25, 2016 2:23 am

I don't know what to think about that.

Either she's really emotional right now and is having a meltdown

Or she has another account and is just playing for sympathy

CashRules · Post by **CashRules** » Fri Mar 25, 2016 2:27 am

She's a troll. I've been saying for over a year that she's an idiot and everybody just let it slide. That's one of the problems I've always had with that board. Somebody like ErJen or Blade can post their right-wing stupidity and the entire board jumps all over them. But along comes someone like Goz whose stupidity comes from the 'left' and everybody lets it slide because "she's one of us". Goz and I agree far more than we disagree, but I don't need idiots agreeing with me.

Post by **Islandmur** » Fri Mar 25, 2016 2:31 am

Well I am not going to come down on someone for not being smart, I often feel dumb when reading posts myself. And one can't really help their intellect.

Though I must admit in Goz's case it often seems like she just refused to admit she's wrong even though i'm pretty sure she understood perfectly well what was being said.

Derived Absurdity · Post by **Derived Absurdity** » Fri Mar 25, 2016 2:36 am

So someone who supports military coups, appropriations bills for illegal wars of aggression, genocidal blockades which murder millions of people, and ethnic cleansing doesn't qualify as a "warmonger" to you?

I've made it clear that I'm not a pacifist and that I support violence in some circumstances, so I realize some war is necessary... imperial coups, criminal invasions, genocidal blockades, and ethnic cleansing do not qualify.

CashRules · Post by **CashRules** » Fri Mar 25, 2016 2:37 am

I'm not so sure she's ever understood because she's been pulling that act ever since she's been posting there. This is someone who once posted a link to statistics on gun control that said "this study claims no causative link between the number of guns in a society and the level of violent crime in that society" but insisted, even after this was quoted for her, that it showed causation.

Also, part of being smart is knowing not to argue a topic with people who understand that topic much better. Goz doesn't grasp this fact, not at all.

CashRules · Post by **CashRules** » Fri Mar 25, 2016 2:38 am

Okay DA.

Derived Absurdity · Post by **Derived Absurdity** » Fri Mar 25, 2016 2:44 am

You and your substance. Always scintillating.

CashRules · Post by **CashRules** » Fri Mar 25, 2016 2:47 am

I know, I should have made a post explaining that Sanders doesn't even come close to the current candidates, the current President and the previous four Presidents in terms of war mongering. I'll remember that next time.

Derived Absurdity · Post by **Derived Absurdity** » Fri Mar 25, 2016 2:53 am

Yeah, "less of a warmonger than other warmongers" = "not a warmonger". That's your brilliant logic. My examples of actual warmongering are irrelevant.

I'll remember this logic in the future. Whenever someone says someone is [X], I'll just point out that he's not as much of [X] as [Y], therefore he's not [X] at all! Fool-proof!

CashRules · Post by **CashRules** » Fri Mar 25, 2016 2:59 am

That might work if we were talking about something for which there was a definitive understanding. But what one person considers a war monger is naturally going to be different than what another person has in mind for war mongering. But keep thinking you're qualified to argue logic with me, that's always entertaining.

Derived Absurdity · Post by **Derived Absurdity** » Fri Mar 25, 2016 3:03 am

Nice, I expected your response to be an attempt to cow me into submission with a blizzard of insults, which is your usual M.O. Instead it's just unearned condescension. At least it's a change of pace.

CashRules · Post by **CashRules** » Fri Mar 25, 2016 3:06 am

I know, I should have explained that "war monger' is largely a matter of personal opinion and not one of strict definition. I'll remember that next time.

Derived Absurdity · Post by **Derived Absurdity** » Fri Mar 25, 2016 3:08 am

And it's my personal opinion that he is. You seem to think he's not just because some other people are worse.

CashRules · Post by **CashRules** » Fri Mar 25, 2016 3:11 am

No, in my opinion:

The term 'war monger' loses any real meaning when applied to someone like Bernie Sanders.

In modern society, Bernie Sanders is about the closest to "qualified to be President while not wanting to wage war across half the planet" that any rational person can expect.

Derived Absurdity · Post by **Derived Absurdity** » Fri Mar 25, 2016 3:23 am

So why is it irrational to want him to support less military aggression than he does? Given the examples I provided.

CashRules · Post by **CashRules** » Fri Mar 25, 2016 3:32 am

Military coups + blockades =/= war mongering. It could be war mongering but supporting those actions is not sufficient to be war mongering. There is no such thing as an illegal war from the standpoint of a U.S. Senator, that doesn't even make sense. If the U.S. Congress approves a military action then it is, by definition, legal. If the Executive branch sends troops into battle without Congressional approval then it would be illegal, but Sanders is not a member of the Executive Branch. You'll have to elaborate on how Sanders has supported ethnic cleansing.

Derived Absurdity · Post by **Derived Absurdity** » Fri Mar 25, 2016 3:40 am

i) I'm talking about illegal under international law, not national law, ii) I provided far, far more examples of warmongering than coups and blockades (which is a misspeak; what I meant to say was "sanctions"), and iii) I agree with the standard anti-imperialist argument that the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza is a form of decades-long ethnic cleansing, which Bernie Sanders has supported through legislation. See "The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine" by Ilan Pappe.

CashRules · Post by **CashRules** » Fri Mar 25, 2016 3:45 am

Show where, in the U.S. Constitution, it grants authority over U.S. sovereignty to any non U.S. agency. The rest of your post is all opinion, which I've already discussed. I'm not saying your opinion is wrong, just that you are wrong in assuming that your opinion of Sanders as a war monger should carry any more weight than someone else's opposing opinion when there is no universally agree upon definition of war monger.

Derived Absurdity · Post by **Derived Absurdity** » Fri Mar 25, 2016 3:50 am

The United States should at least theoretically be subject to international law.

CashRules · Post by **CashRules** » Fri Mar 25, 2016 3:57 am

It's not. It's not even allowed to be considered. As far as the U.S. Constitution is concerned there is no such thing as international law.

Derived Absurdity · Post by **Derived Absurdity** » Fri Mar 25, 2016 4:06 am

So the Constitution gives the United States carte blanche to disregard the ICC, the Geneva Conventions, etc.? What if the constitutions of other nations refused to grant authority to outside organizations, would that be justified? What would be the point of even having international law?

CashRules · Post by **CashRules** » Fri Mar 25, 2016 4:17 am

As it stands now there is no point. International law exists only as a useful fiction that, yes, may be disregarded at any time by any nation with no punishment except that which other nations may choose to enact. Whether that is right or wrong is irrelevant to the fact that it just is.

CashRules · Post by **CashRules** » Tue Mar 29, 2016 3:51 pm

That number is fast approaching 100%.

Gypsy-Vanner · Post by **Gypsy-Vanner** » Wed Mar 30, 2016 9:59 pm

I want to have Bernies love child.

Derived Absurdity · Post by **Derived Absurdity** » Fri Jul 01, 2016 1:47 am

That's it. Fuck them all. Everyone. Everyone. Nuke it from space. Somehow. 100%. Leave no one alive.

Cassius Clay · Post by **Cassius Clay** » Fri Jul 01, 2016 2:55 am

That untrve fucker made the mistake of unblocking me. Let the trolling games begin!

Derived Absurdity · Post by **Derived Absurdity** » Fri Jul 01, 2016 3:01 am

Good luck, those people are so stupid I don't even know how to troll them.

Cassius Clay · Post by **Cassius Clay** » Fri Jul 01, 2016 3:11 am

Watch and learn...

Cassius Clay · Post by **Cassius Clay** » Sat Jul 02, 2016 6:51 pm

Yo DA. Good job tearing that micgee fucker a new asshole. Dude keeps dishonestly shifting the burden of proof anyway way he can. Even saying you can't call ignorant racists racist because no one has shown them scientific proof they're wrong. Un-fucking-believable.

And worov sabotaged my trolling attempt on untrve. I was trying to give a hard time by exposing how much he actually cares about what people think...'cause I've observed him to be a contrarian...who really wants to project this edgy image. Then worov comes along and plays right into it...thinking he's insulting him by saying he cares about nothing.

That's exactly what he wants you to think, dumbass!

Cassius Clay · Post by **Cassius Clay** » Sat Jul 02, 2016 7:21 pm

And here comes Captaind Devil's Advocate, Eva! Jesus Christ..

Derived Absurdity · Post by **Derived Absurdity** » Sat Jul 02, 2016 8:08 pm

Lol, I can't really tell if that micgee guy is actually dishonest or just dumb. I think he's probably both... leaning a bit more to the dishonest side. I've never actually seen anyone present the arguments he did, that you can't call people racists just because they don't have the minds of supercomputers that can analyze and take in all the evidence that would "disprove" racism, or something... lol. That's a new one. Points for originality!

Worov is... something. I don't know what his problem is. He's trying to troll, but as you just proved he's not even good at it. He's so bad at it that he actually ruins other people's trolling. His attempts at being mean are like a stupid eleven-year-old kid I used to know... just mindlessly blurting out the first "mean" thing that pops into your head without regard for context or whether it makes any circumstantial sense at all. It's bizarre. Like a malfunctioning robot programmed to spit out random aggression.