The backlash to Target's gender-neutral kids section makes no sense
-
- Ultimate Poster
- Posts: 1487
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2015 5:40 am
The backlash to Target's gender-neutral kids section makes no sense
Like this article. This article makes no sense, even within its own logic: http://time.com/3992485/target-gender-n ... rrectness/
If boys and girls need signs to tell them what they're supposed to be biologically predisposed to like, then THEY'RE NOT BIOLOGICALLY PREDISPOSED TO LIKE THEM.
If boys and girls need signs to tell them what they're supposed to be biologically predisposed to like, then THEY'RE NOT BIOLOGICALLY PREDISPOSED TO LIKE THEM.
-
- Ultimate Poster
- Posts: 1794
- Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2015 5:11 pm
Re: The backlash to Target's gender-neutral kids section makes no sense
"But she's not entitled to demand society conform to her views"
Yet the author will do the same apparently.
[edit]Seriously, the author misses the whole point of gender neutrality in this regard, which is so that kids can feel comfortable exploring interests that won't make them feel like outcasts just because they chose something considered more for the other gender.
Yet the author will do the same apparently.
[edit]Seriously, the author misses the whole point of gender neutrality in this regard, which is so that kids can feel comfortable exploring interests that won't make them feel like outcasts just because they chose something considered more for the other gender.
Re: The backlash to Target's gender-neutral kids section makes no sense
Gender neutrality ignores that boys and girls are biologically different
How in the names of the all the demons of Hell does one retailer making a marketing decision represent American groupthink (OMG WAKE UP SHEEPLE!)In a spectacular display of American groupthink, Target has become gender-neutral.
Yes, congrats, you have found the last taboo, it is admitting sex differentiation. I wore a dress the other day and was stoned in the streets for not wearing a unisex smock like THE PC POLICE DEMAND.That boys and girls are vastly different—that they have different hormones, different brain structures, different attitudes, different preferences and different behaviors, all due to their unique biology—is now taboo to admit.
Well I guess you, a lone person with a limited social network, probably has a better idea of the feelings of Target consumers than Target does.I've spent thousands of dollars at Target since I became a mother (of a boy and a girl) more than 15 years ago, and I've never seen nor heard of a parent who was put off by gender-based aisles.
That's capitalism, you fucking ninny. Target have made a marketing decision in response to consumer feedback to please their audience base. That is how you business.That's political correctness: when companies (or governments, or churches) cave to pressure from a select, albeit vociferous, few who insist society change to accommodate them.
Yes she is. Society doesn't have to conform but she is just as entitled as anyone to have an opinion on it, like you are having by writing this piece demanding that society conforms to YOUR opinions.But she's not entitled to demand society conform to her views
No, you preposterous cockwomble, that is demonstrably not what is being said. Sex =/= gender. Gender is socially constructed. Dolls are girl toys because we have culturally assigned them as girl toys. Not because there is something hardwired into XX chromosomes that make us fuckin love Barbie.Read: Biology isn't real. We've just been taught to think it is.
hey Louann Brizendine, my sister and I used to hit each other with our dinosaur dolls does this mean I am a boy with an aggressive male brain plz advise“The behavioral influences of male and female hormones on the brain are major," writes Brizendine. “My son didn't turn Barbie into a sword because his environment promoted the use of weapons. He was practicing the instincts of his male brain to aggressively protect and defend."
what.The point is that Target has legitimized the hoopla surrounding Caitlyn Jenner.
did u just fuckin misgender Caitlin JennerThere's a huge difference between a Hollywood personality insisting he's neither fully male nor fully female and allowing an entertainment industry to exploit his predicament for monetary gain, and another for a major Midwestern retailer that caters to millions of families across this country to perpetuate the notion that biology isn't real when it is.
did u
how bout u go fuck yourself
I hate you.
NOBODY SAID THERE IS, YOU PISSWEASELThere's nothing wrong with the fact that girls walk around with dolls in their arms while boys look for things they can smash or crash.
NOBODY IS SAYING THAT GIRLS AREN'T ALLOWED DOLLIES ANY MORE
ARE YOU HIGH
AM I
CATS CHASING DOGSThe new Target policy is nothing more than political correctness run amok. What's next?
ANARCHY
MEN MARRYING HORSES
DECLINE OF AMERICA
SAVE US
Yes, Target no longer stocking their toys according to gender is exactly the same as being able to list yourself as an inanimate object or Sweden at the doctor's surgery.Will the 'male' and 'female' checkboxes on medical forms soon say 'person, place or thing'?
ur face is madnessIt's madness.
WORDS IN THE HEART CANNOT BE TAKEN
Re: The backlash to Target's gender-neutral kids section makes no sense
It's obvious that feminists won't be happy until everybody is treated equally.
__
You can't hang a man for killing a woman who's trying to steal his horse.
You can't hang a man for killing a woman who's trying to steal his horse.
Re: The backlash to Target's gender-neutral kids section makes no sense
Great pic!aels wrote:
Common sense is another word for prejudice.
-
- Ultimate Poster
- Posts: 1487
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2015 5:40 am
Re: The backlash to Target's gender-neutral kids section makes no sense
@aels - that is a beautiful rebuttal and I learnt so many new words from it. :'|
I also love how that chart has been going around again. :D
It's another contradiction on her part to on the one hand insist that boys and girls are completely different in brains/interests/hormones etc, and then insist that Caitlyn is male when she at least has female hormones and feminine interests; or to consider it a symptom of the gender-neutralization of society, when the whole point about being trans is having a gender that is *not* neutral.
I also love how that chart has been going around again. :D
It's another contradiction on her part to on the one hand insist that boys and girls are completely different in brains/interests/hormones etc, and then insist that Caitlyn is male when she at least has female hormones and feminine interests; or to consider it a symptom of the gender-neutralization of society, when the whole point about being trans is having a gender that is *not* neutral.
- OpiateOfTheMasses
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 520
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 11:14 pm
- Location: A little island somewhere
Re: The backlash to Target's gender-neutral kids section makes no sense
Whilst I essentially agree with you, there is one small fly in the ointment...
Putting ball games/games that involve throwing - you know things like rugby, basketball, baseball, cricket, darts, etc in the "gender neutral" section is a little unfair, because it may encourage girls to think they can play them, and all these involve hand-to-eye coordination which has been proven to be something that females just aren't capable of doing.
But otherwise, I'm right there with you!
Putting ball games/games that involve throwing - you know things like rugby, basketball, baseball, cricket, darts, etc in the "gender neutral" section is a little unfair, because it may encourage girls to think they can play them, and all these involve hand-to-eye coordination which has been proven to be something that females just aren't capable of doing.
But otherwise, I'm right there with you!
You can't make everyone happy. You are not pizza.
-
- Ultra Poster
- Posts: 877
- Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2015 12:18 am
Re: The backlash to Target's gender-neutral kids section makes no sense
I can't tell if that post is serious or not...OpiateOfTheMasses wrote:Whilst I essentially agree with you, there is one small fly in the ointment...
Putting ball games/games that involve throwing - you know things like rugby, basketball, baseball, cricket, darts, etc in the "gender neutral" section is a little unfair, because it may encourage girls to think they can play them, and all these involve hand-to-eye coordination which has been proven to be something that females just aren't capable of doing.
But otherwise, I'm right there with you!
- OpiateOfTheMasses
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 520
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 11:14 pm
- Location: A little island somewhere
Re: The backlash to Target's gender-neutral kids section makes no sense
Not. (Hence the winky face)
It's just that 'er indoors blames the fact that she can neither throw nor catch because she's a woman...
It's just that 'er indoors blames the fact that she can neither throw nor catch because she's a woman...
You can't make everyone happy. You are not pizza.
- OpiateOfTheMasses
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 520
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 11:14 pm
- Location: A little island somewhere
Re: The backlash to Target's gender-neutral kids section makes no sense
Her indoors. It's a London expression meaning the wife, because historically the man would go out to work and the wife would stay at home (to look after the kids, clean, cook, etc) and be "indoors".
You can't make everyone happy. You are not pizza.
-
- Ultimate Poster
- Posts: 1794
- Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2015 5:11 pm
Re: The backlash to Target's gender-neutral kids section makes no sense
I know it was a joke but...
The interesting thing about the throwing issue is I remember the Mythbusters episode testing "Throw like a girl" insult. They found untrained girls to be more accurate but not as powerful, untrained boys having more power but less accuracy. Trained athletes from both sexes had no significant mechanical differences.
The interesting thing about the throwing issue is I remember the Mythbusters episode testing "Throw like a girl" insult. They found untrained girls to be more accurate but not as powerful, untrained boys having more power but less accuracy. Trained athletes from both sexes had no significant mechanical differences.
- Ptolemy_Banana
- Super Poster
- Posts: 359
- Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2015 1:03 pm
Re: The backlash to Target's gender-neutral kids section makes no sense
You mean the trained female athletes were as powerful and accurate as the trained male athletes?Unvoiced_Apollo wrote:I know it was a joke but...
The interesting thing about the throwing issue is I remember the Mythbusters episode testing "Throw like a girl" insult. They found untrained girls to be more accurate but not as powerful, untrained boys having more power but less accuracy. Trained athletes from both sexes had no significant mechanical differences.
Re: The backlash to Target's gender-neutral kids section makes no sense
Huh, I learned something new!OpiateOfTheMasses wrote:Her indoors. It's a London expression meaning the wife, because historically the man would go out to work and the wife would stay at home (to look after the kids, clean, cook, etc) and be "indoors".
-
- Ultimate Poster
- Posts: 1794
- Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2015 5:11 pm
Re: The backlash to Target's gender-neutral kids section makes no sense
I don't honestly remember. By mechanical differences, I mean form. And apparently the female athlete was more accurate than trained male athlete.Ptolemy_Banana wrote:You mean the trained female athletes were as powerful and accurate as the trained male athletes?Unvoiced_Apollo wrote:I know it was a joke but...
The interesting thing about the throwing issue is I remember the Mythbusters episode testing "Throw like a girl" insult. They found untrained girls to be more accurate but not as powerful, untrained boys having more power but less accuracy. Trained athletes from both sexes had no significant mechanical differences.
Re: The backlash to Target's gender-neutral kids section makes no sense
The other day I went to the toy store (in haiti) to buy Nate a toy... he wanted Princess Hanna... I didn't buy it because it was too expensive, but it brought back to me that when it comes to dress and toys, girls have it easier than boys. Dress a girl in pants it's nothing, dress a boy in skirts and he's gay or asexual or transgender or this or that.
Nate likes to explore things he sees the girls putting on lipstick and make up and he wants to do it also, i let him I don't care, but man the things I hear! And yet he is not feminine at all. To him make up is just part of a costume and he llikes to dress up...
I digress.
Nate likes to explore things he sees the girls putting on lipstick and make up and he wants to do it also, i let him I don't care, but man the things I hear! And yet he is not feminine at all. To him make up is just part of a costume and he llikes to dress up...
I digress.
-
- Ultimate Poster
- Posts: 1794
- Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2015 5:11 pm
Re: The backlash to Target's gender-neutral kids section makes no sense
This is a double standard I've wondered about. Not that I ever wanted to wear a dress .Islandmur wrote:The other day I went to the toy store (in haiti) to buy Nate a toy... he wanted Princess Hanna... I didn't buy it because it was too expensive, but it brought back to me that when it comes to dress and toys, girls have it easier than boys. Dress a girl in pants it's nothing, dress a boy in skirts and he's gay or asexual or transgender or this or that.
Nate likes to explore things he sees the girls putting on lipstick and make up and he wants to do it also, i let him I don't care, but man the things I hear! And yet he is not feminine at all. To him make up is just part of a costume and he llikes to dress up...
I digress.
-
- Ultra Poster
- Posts: 877
- Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2015 12:18 am
Re: The backlash to Target's gender-neutral kids section makes no sense
There are many ways in which the patriarchy is a bad thing for men as well as women.
- Cassius Clay
- Ultimate Poster
- Posts: 2419
- Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2015 8:03 pm
Re: The backlash to Target's gender-neutral kids section makes no sense
Obviously patriarchy benefits men, but I do think Mur is correct that it's more acceptable for women to express masculinity than men to express feminity.
Re: The backlash to Target's gender-neutral kids section makes no sense
It's because women are inferior to men in patriarchy, so a man expressing femininity is downgrading himself and a woman expressing masculinity is upgrading. Which is why women with masculine traits such as aggressiveness are considered "strong, smart, etc, etc" when it's just catering to what the patriarchy has already established as "strong".
Which is why I like How to train your dragon a lot, the main character is a boy who doesn't use violence or any "masculinity" traits to come across as a strong person. It's quite rare to find male characters like that.
Which is why I like How to train your dragon a lot, the main character is a boy who doesn't use violence or any "masculinity" traits to come across as a strong person. It's quite rare to find male characters like that.
-
- Ultimate Poster
- Posts: 1794
- Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2015 5:11 pm
Re: The backlash to Target's gender-neutral kids section makes no sense
Dr_Liszt wrote:It's because women are inferior to men in patriarchy, so a man expressing femininity is downgrading himself and a woman expressing masculinity is upgrading. Which is why women with masculine traits such as aggressiveness are considered "strong, smart, etc, etc" when it's just catering to what the patriarchy has already established as "strong".
Which is why I like How to train your dragon a lot, the main character is a boy who doesn't use violence or any "masculinity" traits to come across as a strong person. It's quite rare to find male characters like that.
Well you know, except for the part where he shoots down Toothless & uses him to violently defeat the red death.
Re: The backlash to Target's gender-neutral kids section makes no sense
Well yeah, no one is perfect.
-
- Ultimate Poster
- Posts: 1487
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2015 5:40 am
Re: The backlash to Target's gender-neutral kids section makes no sense
^this. The patriarchy basically privileges men and masculinity while devaluing women and femininity. So women who are masculine also get some privilege, while men who are feminine lose some.It's because women are inferior to men in patriarchy, so a man expressing femininity is downgrading himself and a woman expressing masculinity is upgrading. Which is why women with masculine traits such as aggressiveness are considered "strong, smart, etc, etc" when it's just catering to what the patriarchy has already established as "strong".
Re: The backlash to Target's gender-neutral kids section makes no sense
And the kicker is that women who express themselves in a masculine way may sometimes also be punished for acting outside of their gender roles. For example, when women are upfront and aggressive in work situations (especially salary negotiations/promotions), it backfires on them and they're *less* likely to be promoted (and more likely to be thought of as a bitch). Can't find the study at the moment but I've read it within the last year, I'm sure.
WORDS IN THE HEART CANNOT BE TAKEN
-
- Super Poster
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2015 11:56 pm
Re: The backlash to Target's gender-neutral kids section makes no sense
A man would have found it by now.aels wrote:And the kicker is that women who express themselves in a masculine way may sometimes also be punished for acting outside of their gender roles. For example, when women are upfront and aggressive in work situations (especially salary negotiations/promotions), it backfires on them and they're *less* likely to be promoted (and more likely to be thought of as a bitch). Can't find the study at the moment but I've read it within the last year, I'm sure.
-
- Ultra Poster
- Posts: 877
- Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2015 12:18 am
Re: The backlash to Target's gender-neutral kids section makes no sense
We all know men don't put any effort into finding something. if it isn't in immediate line of sight, it's never going to be located.Pope Bucky wrote:A man would have found it by now.aels wrote:And the kicker is that women who express themselves in a masculine way may sometimes also be punished for acting outside of their gender roles. For example, when women are upfront and aggressive in work situations (especially salary negotiations/promotions), it backfires on them and they're *less* likely to be promoted (and more likely to be thought of as a bitch). Can't find the study at the moment but I've read it within the last year, I'm sure.
-
- Ultimate Poster
- Posts: 1794
- Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2015 5:11 pm
Re: The backlash to Target's gender-neutral kids section makes no sense
Not sure if this is quite the same & it's a bit late. But better late than never...or being a womanaels wrote:And the kicker is that women who express themselves in a masculine way may sometimes also be punished for acting outside of their gender roles. For example, when women are upfront and aggressive in work situations (especially salary negotiations/promotions), it backfires on them and they're *less* likely to be promoted (and more likely to be thought of as a bitch). Can't find the study at the moment but I've read it within the last year, I'm sure.
Http://time.com/money/3986479/angry-wom ... ved-worth/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;